β
Monnai is an API-based B2B solution suite that provides consumer insights for fintechs across the globe. Their primary markets are the emerging fintech markets of India, South-East Asia and LATAM, where they have a stable customer base and have currently achieved PMF with their solutions.
Monnai's API solution provides state-of-the-art, real-time intelligence powered by alternate data - we aim to bring inclusive financial coverage to all sections of the population.
β
β
β
For the purpose this assignment, we will consider a flagship product offering within Monnai - Monnai Risk Engine.
Monnai Risk Engine is an offering that aims to ease onboarding & credit decisioning through customizable rules & ML-driven scoring models.
The product aims to unlock access to financial instruments for all segments of the population through its tailored solution platform.
A snapshot of the product dashboard displaying masked user information with Risk Score -
ββ
βUnlock access to underserved population - Monnai provides you insights & recommendations that help you make much better decisions on New-to-credit (NTC) and Thin File (limited credit) users.
β
Stop fraudsters at on-boarding - Monnai Risk Score aims to build firewalls & early warning signals against bad actors who attempt to gain access to the financial system to perform illegal/fraudulent actions.
β
Identify your most trustworthy users - Monnai's intelligent algorithms separate your users all the way from "Trusted" to "Highest Risk", enabling you to tailor your offerings based on the risk profiling.
β
Predict future delinquent behavior - Predict your customers' future behavior over the next 30-60-90 days and identify who are your likeliest users to become delinquent.
β
Explainable Decisioning - Monnai's decisioning platform provides insights & complete raw data behind every decision that helps inform users on all the key insights that goes into decisioning.
β
β
The primary customers of Monnai's Risk Score are fintech & lending platforms in India & Southeast Asia, with a smaller presence in LATAM, Americas & Europe.
Unfortunately, being a B2B business focused on company outcomes rather than individual outcomes, online research does not reveal a lot about what Monnai customers feel about the product.
However, by talking directly with customers through Zoom/GMeet calls, phone calls & Slack discussions - we have been able to narrow down our user base into a set of ICP's which can be chosen for the exercise.
β
Our first ICP is Shreya, a Product Lead at a Unicorn Fintech. Below are her detailed attributes -
β
Category | Attributes | Details |
---|---|---|
Persona | Age | 30-35 |
Gender | F | |
Role | Head of Product | |
Work Experience | 10+ years | |
Annual Income | 50+ LPA | |
Org Level | Mid-Senior | |
What do they optimize for? | Risk | |
Company Details | Customer Type | Direct |
Industry domain | Financial Services | |
Sub-domain/use-case | Payments & Credit | |
Company revenue | $10M+ | |
Market | Tier I, Tier II | |
Org size | 500-1000 | |
Purchase Decision Parametersβ | Role in buying process | Decision Influencer |
Influencers | Risk & Compliance teams | |
Blockers | Finance & Legal | |
Time to realize value | Within weeks of integration | |
Channels of interest | Preferred Communication Channels | Email, WhatsApp, Calls |
Channels used in workplace | Slack, Google Suite | |
Relevant channels used outside workplace | LinkedIn, Glassdoor, Instagram, Twitter | |
Media consumption | YouTube, Netflix |
β
I am unable to identify who are my risky & non-risky users when we on-board them via our channels (e-commerce, grocery etc). Our market also consists of young users with limited financial backgrounds and we need to understand them better.
β
This is resulting in fraud & late payments which is expensive to act on at a later stage.
β
β
Our second ICP is Samir, Head of Compliance @ Lending firm focused in Tier II, III cities -
Category | Attributes | Details |
---|---|---|
Persona | Age | 35-40 |
Gender | M | |
Role | Head of Risk & Compliance | |
Work Experience | 15+ years | |
Annual Income | 50+ LPA | |
Org Level | Senior | |
What do they optimize for? | Risk | |
Company | Customer Type | Direct |
Industry domain | Financial Services | |
Sub-domain/use-case | Lending | |
Company revenue | $30M+ | |
Market | Tier II, Tier III | |
Org size | 300-500 | |
Purchase Decision Parameter | Role in buying process | Decision Maker |
Influencers | Senior Management | |
Blockers | Legal | |
Time to realize value | Within months of integration | |
Channels of Interest | Preferred Channels | Email, Calls |
Channels used in workplace | Microsoft Teams, Atlassian | |
Relevant channels used outside workplace | WhatsApp, LinkedIn | |
Media consumption | YouTube |
β
β
β
β
β
Our third ICP is Rishab, Growth Leader @ Identity Verification Channel Partner -
β
Category | Attributes | Details |
---|---|---|
Persona | Age | 35-40 |
Gender | M | |
Role | VP of Growth | |
Work Experience | 15+ years | |
Annual Income | 50+ LPA | |
Org Level | Mid-Senior | |
What do they optimize for? | Revenue | |
Company | Customer Type | Channel partner |
Industry domain | Identity Verification | |
Sub-domain/use-case | Fraud Prevention, Data Enrichment | |
Company revenue | $50M+ | |
Market | Tier I, Tier II (based on partner's customer base) | |
Org size | 500-1000 | |
Purchase Decision Parameters | Role in buying process | Decision Influencer |
Influencers | Sales teams | |
Blockers | Finance & Legal | |
Time to realize value | Within months of integration | |
Channels of Interestβ | Preferred Channels | Email, Slack, WhatsApp |
Channels used in workplace | Slack, Google Suite, Atlassian | |
Relevant channels used outside workplace | LinkedIn, Twitter, WhatsApp | |
Media consumption | YouTube, Netflix |
β
β
Using the ICP Prioritization Framework, we arrive at our final ICP's to target for this asignment -
β
Attribute | ICP 1 | ICP 2 | ICP 3 |
---|---|---|---|
Adoption Curve | Fast | Fast | Fast |
Frequency of use-case | Very High | High | High |
Appetite to pay | High | Highest | High |
TAM | Large | Medium | Large |
Distribution potential | High | Medium | High |
Growth Potential | High | Medium | Very High |
Pros | 1. Distribution potential is high 2. Sufficiently able to buy/ influence buying decision 3. Growth potential is high | 1. Strongest at influencing buying decision 2. Excellent PMF | 1. Distribution potential is very high 2. Growth potential is high 3. Good PMF & potential long-term synergy |
Cons | Higher potential for churn due to nature of business | 1. Low distribution potential - channels targeted may not pan out 2. Low growth potential | Slower value realization due to nature of business |
Final verdict | Yes π | No π« | Yes π |
β
β
β
For the scope of this assignment, we need to view the company's potential under the B2B2C lens in India alone. This is because Monnai earns revenue based on the number of customers/users that get on-boarded to their customer's platforms, hence indirectly tying their market to the needs of the end users.
In that regard, looking the core value that Monnai can offer to fintechs, we need to estimate the number of users who are likely to start availing online financial services over the next 5 years.
We consider the below factors -
Considering the available market of 150 million new user on-boardings, Monnai will only be able to capture some of these due to -
Considering these limitations, we will take ~80% of the market, which is roughly 120 million new user on-boardings.
β
The SOM for this product will depend on the match-making between exact value prop & the need that customers have for such a product.
The competitive landscape for Monnai is significant, and the market is typically splitting between 3-4 major players right now. The market however is highly serviceable, with companies constantly looking for new or better solutions to solve their on-boarding problems. Around 20% of companies may currently not be looking for new providers.
β
Based on this, we will take 80% of this market again to arrive at a SOM of ~100 million new user on-boardings spread across various financial services & applications.
Based on the ICP's and the available value propositions for the product, we can narrow down on the below Core Value Propositions that will go into the Acquisition channel messaging -
β
Identify & separate your riskiest & trustworthy users - Monnai's intelligent algorithms separate your users all the way from "Trusted" to "Highest Risk", enabling you to tailor your offerings based on the risk profiling.
β
βUnlock access to underserved population - Monnai provides you insights & recommendations that help you make much better decisions on New-to-credit (NTC) and Thin File (limited credit) users.
β
Explainable Decisioning - Monnai's decisioning platform provides insights & complete raw data behind every decision that helps inform users on all the key insights that goes into decisioning.
β
β
β
In this experiment, we will run a paid ads program that generates in-bound leads & helps build publicity for the product.
β
Our first step is to identify the strongest PMF & ICP for the product - this is where our right to win is.
β
For this, we will choose our ICP 1 - Product @ Payment Fintech as a target. In this case, we will not further optimize for factors such as gender or hobbies, and instead focus on the keys to unlock this channel.
β
Channel selection - LinkedIn Ads
Audience - Middle & upper management executives aged 30+ in Finance, Banking & Fintech companies
This can be achieved through LinkedIn's ad targeting mechanism -
Geography - India, to start with. We can hyper-target with Bengaluru, Mumbai if required.
β
β
β
Target company industry & size filters will be applied (Finance and 500+)
β
β
To match with our ICP, we can choose job experience of 10+ years and mid-senior to senior levels.
Further, we can optimize on member skills to be in Product, Compliance & Business Development.
β
β
We will not optimize for gender, but optimize for ages above 30. The remaining attributes do not need further filtering.
β
β
β
The goal is also to avoid hyper-targeting in this experiment, so as to put the word out on the company & get as many leads as possible.
The messaging is clear and succinct - "Monnai provides a better way to on-board and know your customers, so that you can identify the safe users while eliminating risk."
β
β
β
The messaging here - "Monnai helps you make better decisions for all segments of the population, ensuring we do right by both you and your customers."
β
β
β
For this experiment, we will continue to use similar channels, but instead go for targeted Account-Based Marketing.
β
On top of this ABM strategy, we will attempt to create a mini PLG motion where the user gets to experience the product before they move into the Sales cycle.
β
Step 1 - Monnai will identify a set of leads & potential companies for the platform, which can span across geographies in India, Indonesia, LATAM. The idea is to identify companies which have an affinity for such a use-case, but may not be tempted to use or consider Monnai's product.
β
Step 2 - Using LinkedIn Company Targeting, we implement an ABM mechanism that displays targeted ads across a list of prospects using a list.
β
β
β
Here, since we have already shortlisted the prospect list, we only need to ensure fitment within our ICP #1, ICP #3 (chosen ICP's). For this, LinkedIn's Job Experience/Demographics filters can be applied on top -
β
β
β
Step 3 - Once we have this targeted strategy ready, the task is to create a good creative that tempts the user to actually try the product directly.
β
Step 4 - With a CTA on "Try now", the page will lead them to a direct sandbox portal, where Monnai will control access for users who arrive through these links only.
In this page, users will have 2 credits which they can use to check email & phone number of any user, which will give them a masked response with blurred details.
β
β
(Mockup for reference, this implementation will need to have a lot more finesse)
Step 5 - User will ideally try to use their 2 credits & check for the risk categories & recommendations out of curiosity. On the third attempt, the page will prompt them to contact Monnai for a POC & proceed with the Sales cycle.
β
For this phase, the strategy will be to focus on ICP #3.
Who is the ICP?β
Our partner ICP is typically a Growth Leader at an Identity Channel Partner. They can also be of a similar role in a Alternate Data/Financial Services Partner, since the motivations & roles of these personas tend to remain the same.
How will the partnership work?
Step 1 - Monnai will provide a partnership benefit to channel partners in the form of a direct payment incentive. This will be worked out as a % of revenue brought onto Monnai by the channel partner.
This will be calculated based on the MRR brought in by the partner, and disbursed on a monthly cycle.
β
Step 2 - The partner on-boards onto Monnai platform with an integration via API, and then provides access to Monnai services to their customers.
Step 3 - Partner evangelizes Monnai services to their customers based on the Core Value Prop.
Core Value Proposition for Channel customers will focus on -β
How does this benefit the partner?
How will they keep track?
Monnai will display -
β
/
β
β
β
β
β
β
Brand focused courses
Great brands aren't built on clicks. They're built on trust. Craft narratives that resonate, campaigns that stand out, and brands that last.
All courses
Master every lever of growth β from acquisition to retention, data to events. Pick a course, go deep, and apply it to your business right away.
Explore foundations by GrowthX
Built by Leaders From Amazon, CRED, Zepto, Hindustan Unilever, Flipkart, paytm & more
Crack a new job or a promotion with the Career Centre
Designed for mid-senior & leadership roles across growth, product, marketing, strategy & business
Learning Resources
Browse 500+ case studies, articles & resources the learning resources that you won't find on the internet.
Patienceβyouβre about to be impressed.